Past Event
Traumatic Brain Injury Cases 101: Plaintiff, Defense, and Doctor Perspectives
December 5, 2025
Christopher Mavros presents two sessions as part of the National Business Institute program, “Traumatic Brain Injury Cases 101: Plaintiff, Defense, and Doctor Perspectives.”
The program offers multiple perspectives of brain injury cases from plaintiff and defense counsel, as well as doctor viewpoints, and provides insight into traumatic brain injury cases, including how to evaluate the injury and how to tell the difference between a concussion and a traumatic brain injury.
Defense Tactics Unique to Brain Injury Cases
- Finding Holes in Past and Present Medical/Emotional History
- What to Look for in Employer and School Records
- Using IMEs to Prove the Injury is Not Permanent
- Tips for Defending the IME
- Diagnosing Physician Deposition Strategies
- What to Look for in Surveillance and Photographs
- Spotting Inconsistencies/Exaggerated Severity in Symptoms
- Presenting Other Options for Plaintiff’s Injuries
- Evidence Needed to Prove Full Recovery of Mild Brain Injury (No Fracture)
How to Creatively Present Medical Evidence to Judge and Jury
- Presenting Neuropsychological and Electrodiagnostic Test Results
- Using Publisher to Display MRIs, CT Scans, and X-Rays
- Presenting Medical Records Using PowerPoint
- Articulating Complex Knowledge of the Injury to the Judge/Jury
Recent
News
News
GREG MALLON OBTAINS EARLY DISMISSAL VIA PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
Upon receipt of a new file, Greg immediately spoke with his client, a concrete contractor, and gathered all relevant facts and materials in order to determine whether the joinder of his client was proper. Within days of receiving the assignment, Greg filed preliminary objections arguing that the facts asserted in the complaint do not create a duty for a concrete contractor to protect a tenant of a condominium complex ...
BREAKING NEWS: US SUPREME COURT Unanimously rejects Federal Preemption of Negligence Selection Claims against Freight Brokers
On May 14, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al. that materially affects how catastrophic trucking cases will be evaluated, defended, and insured. For freight brokers, motor carriers, and the insurers that support them, the opinion resolves a long‑standing split among the federal courts and confirms that federal deregulation was never ...