Trucking and Transportation (Jury Trial)

Despite all parties residing in Pike County, PA, over three hours from Philadelphia, Plaintiff filed suit in Philadelphia, hoping to benefit from Philadelphia’s reputation as an overly Plaintiff friendly jurisdiction.

Due to the significant evidence that the defendant driver was at fault, negligence and no comparative fault on the Plaintiff was conceded pre-trial. The case was tried solely on damages.

At the time of this incident, Plaintiff had just started a job selling radio advertising. His experts opined that he was likely to make at least $57,800 per year in that job but would only earn around $33,000 per year as a result of his injuries.

At trial, Ted cross-examined the Plaintiff with numerous social media posts showing that he had ultimately returned to a normal life. Multiple Instagram posts showed the Plaintiff riding his motorcycle, camping, and teaching motorcycle safety. Confident that their cross-examination of Plaintiff’s experts demonstrates the specious nature of Plaintiff’s alleged economic damages, Ted and Ross rested the defense without calling any witnesses.

After deliberating for over 3 hours, the jury agreed and awarded Plaintiff just under $750,000. The award indicated that the jury compensated Plaintiff for his injuries, medical expenses, and past wages but flat out rejected the claim of a longstanding and significant future lost wage claim. The award also indicated that the jury did not believe that Plaintiff was unable to enjoy his life following this incident. Ted’s closing argument also raised questions as to why a Pike County accident was brought to Philadelphia County.

Representative Matters

Summary Judgment for Municipality

Obtained summary judgment on behalf of municipality and mayor concerning employment decisions.

Settled First Amendment Claim

Represented municipality in claim that refusal to grant permit to operate nude bar violated claimant’s first amendment rights.