News

Joseph M. Toddy Successfully Defends Insurer at Trial Against Bad Faith Allegations

February 27, 2026

Trial Counsel, Joseph M. Toddy, who was assisted by Robert H. Hayes prevailed in a bad faith trial in Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania arising from the denial of a total fire loss claim, with the Court entering judgment in favor of a mutual insurance company and rejecting allegations of bad faith.

The Court found that the denial of coverage was properly based on material misrepresentation concerning the nature and occupancy of the insured property. Evidence demonstrated that the lower level of the building had been converted into two additional rental units, increasing occupancy beyond the underwriting parameters under which the policy was issued.

The plaintiffs argued that the carrier knew, or should have known, about the renovations and change in occupancy based on prior exterior survey reports at the property. The Court rejected that theory and concluded that the Company had a reasonable basis for its coverage determination.

Joseph M. Toddy stated, “The Court carefully evaluated the record and concluded that the Company’s coverage determination was reasonable. We are pleased the Court recognized that the claim was handled appropriately and in good faith.

Recent
News

GREG MALLON OBTAINS EARLY DISMISSAL VIA PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

Upon receipt of a new file, Greg immediately spoke with his client, a concrete contractor, and gathered all relevant facts and materials in order to determine whether the joinder of his client was proper. Within days of receiving the assignment, Greg filed preliminary objections arguing that the facts asserted in the complaint do not create a duty for a concrete contractor to protect a tenant of a condominium complex ...

BREAKING NEWS: US SUPREME COURT Unanimously rejects Federal Preemption of Negligence Selection Claims against Freight Brokers

On May 14, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al. that materially affects how catastrophic trucking cases will be evaluated, defended, and insured. For freight brokers, motor carriers, and the insurers that support them, the opinion resolves a long‑standing split among the federal courts and confirms that federal deregulation was never ...